Schließen Zurück Alle Abschnitte einklappen
Prozess-Datensatz: ACEMat™ (de) en

Kerninformationen des Datensatzes
Ort TW
Erläuterungen zur geographischen Repräsentativität Almost all the datasets selected for the LCA refer to the RoW as the geographical reference, as there were no specific environmental profiles available.
Referenzjahr 2021
Name
ACEMat™
Anwendungshinweis für Datensatz The results table shown on the ÖKOBAUDAT refers to the product ACEMat™ R with the specific mass of 0.27 kg/m^2.
Technisches Anwendungsgebiet ACEMat™, woven into mesh structures with rectangular pyramid patterns, has shown effectiveness in erosion control and channel protection. This TRM is especially useful in civil engineering for stabilizing slopes. Rain impact can dislodge topsoil, exposing roots and foundations, thus destabilizing slopes. ACEMat™ not only enhances slope filtration and stabilization but also encourages vegetation growth, offering robust soil and rock slope erosion resistance. In environmental restoration, ACEMat™'s ability to promote vegetation and retain soil makes it a key tool, especially given rising concerns over land degradation. Additionally, these mats are used in constructing channels and swales where they reduce erosion and support vegetation. Research is underway to evaluate their potential in optimizing hydraulic efficiency and maintaining channel bed integrity. Their relevance is growing in stormwater management, as they could mitigate runoff and facilitate water infiltration, contributing to sustainable practices, particularly as climate-related challenges like increased precipitation become more common.
Gliederungsnummer 6.6.07
Klassifizierung
Klassenname : Hierarchieebene
  • OEKOBAU.DAT: 6.6.07 Kunststoffe / Folien und Vliese / Technische Textilien
Allgemeine Anmerkungen zum Datensatz The owner of this EPD shall be liable for the underlying information and evidence. The programme operator Kiwa-Ecobility Experts shall not be liable with respect to manufacturer data, life cycle assessment data and evidence.
Szenarien
  • Szenario: Standard scenario (Standardszenario) - Almost all the datasets selected for the LCA refer to the RoW as the geographical reference, as there were no specific environmental profiles available. Gold-Joint delivers its product to different countries, so the calculation of transport to construction site (A4) was done by taking the average distance, weighted by the proportion of product shipped to each country. For module A4, a data set for a non-specific truck and a transoceanic ship was used. A scaling method was used to calculate the LCA results for the different ACEMat™ products. The scaling was done on the basis of mass per square meter. As a result of scaling there are results for both the fixed and the scalable part of the scaling function. The fixed part means that this number is the same for each product in the product group and the scalable part is the part that depends on the mass per unit area of the product. In order to calculate the correct number of each environmental impact category for each of the products in the product group, the following calculation should be done: [number fixed part]+([specific mass]*[number scalable part]). The input cardboard tube did not have a linear dependence on the specific mass, so the higher quantity of product available was always taken into account to make the scaling as conservative as possible. The input cardboard tube was not having a linear dependance on the specific mass, thus the higher amount of the product available was always considered for the scaling to be as conservative as possible. For C1 the method and amount of the generic data set 'Polyester weefsel' from chapter 22.46 Grondwapening en grondscheiding of the DuboCalc programme (database version NMD 1.8 - 5.01.14052018) was used. In this generic data set, 0.0013h work per m² of geotextile was assumed.
Copyright Ja
Eigentümer des Datensatzes
Quantitative Referenz
Referenzfluss(flüsse)
Materialeigenschaften des Referenzflusses
    • Flächengewicht: 0.27 kg/m^2
    • Schichtdicke: 0.007 m
Zeitliche Repräsentativität
Datensatz gültig bis 2028
Erläuterungen zur zeitlichen Repräsentativität All process-specific data was collected for the 2021 operating year and is therefore up-to-date. The data is based on the annual average.
Technologische Repräsentativität
Technische Beschreibung inklusive der Hintergrundsysteme ACEMat™ is a Turf Reinforcement Mat (TRM) made of high-strength polypropylene monofilament. With its stable and thick three-dimensional woven structures, ACEMat™ is highly effective in controlling severe erosion problems in steep slopes, barren areas, riverbanks, channels, and areas with heavy rainfall. It interlocks with soil to create a solid base, dissipating run-off and stream erosive forces while protecting the soil surface from water splash and wash. Furthermore, it retains seeds and supports plants when vegetation is required, providing exceptional erosion control and enhanced vegetation performance. The primary material for ACEMat™, PP monofilament, is produced by thoroughly mixing and stirring various plastic pellets, followed by extrusion and stretching processes. After the PP monofilament undergoes the arranging process, it is ready to be fed into the production line for weaving ACEMat™. Weaving is a method of fabric production where two distinct sets of yarn interlace at right angles, forming a longitudinal warp direction (machine direction) and a transversal weft direction (cross-machine direction). Through careful textile design, ACEMat™ displays a rectangular arrangement on its surface. After the fabric undergoes heat shrinking, the yarn forms a three-dimensional rectangular pyramid-like structure. Upon passing visual inspection, the fabric is cut to the required lengths, rolled onto paper tubes for packaging, and then stored in the warehouse. The construction process for the turf reinforcement mat, ACEMat™, can be categorized into the following stages: Preparation of the site; Placement of ACEMat™; Execution of anchorage process; Implementation of hydroseeding process.
Flussdiagram(me) oder Abbildung(en)
  • Flow chart ACEMat™ Image

Parameter zur Beschreibung des Ressourceneinsatzes und sonstige Umweltinformationen

IndikatorRichtungEinheit Rohstoffbereitstellung
A1
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Herstellung
A3
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Transport
A4
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Einbau
A5
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Abbruch
C1
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Abfallbehandlung
C3
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Beseitigung
C4
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Recyclingpotential
D
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Komponenten für die Wiederverwendung (CRU)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Exportierte elektrische Energie (EEE)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.09883
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.54
Exportierte thermische Energie (EET)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1702
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.651
Gefährlicher Abfall zur Deponie (HWD)
Output
  • 0.00000228
  • 3.409E-9
  • 0.000003047
  • 0.000001474
  • 0.000007313
  • 0.000002553
  • 1.557E-7
  • 7.814E-7
  • 2.638E-8
  • -0.000007681
Stoffe für die Energierückgewinnung (MER)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Stoffe zum Recycling (MFR)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01014
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01383
  • 0
  • 0
Einsatz von Süßwasserressourcen (FW)
Input
  • 0.006019
  • 1.639E-7
  • 0.002558
  • 0.0001068
  • 0.02396
  • 0.00004826
  • 0.000007483
  • 0.0007793
  • 0.00001811
  • -0.0006966
Entsorgter nicht gefährlicher Abfall (NHWD)
Output
  • 0.03327
  • 0.00008534
  • 0.03284
  • 0.03228
  • 0.09784
  • 0.00111
  • 0.003897
  • 0.0101
  • 0.06931
  • -0.003419
Nicht-erneuerbare Primärenergie als Energieträger (PENRE)
Input
  • 10.71
  • 0.001428
  • 8.116
  • 0.7884
  • 17.18
  • 0.9955
  • 0.06522
  • 0.4308
  • 0.01845
  • -7.102
Nicht-erneuerbare Primärenergie zur stofflichen Nutzung (PENRM)
Input
  • 11.63
  • 0
  • 1.184
  • 0
  • 0.6407
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.6167
Nicht erneuerbare Sekundärbrennstoffe (NRSF)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Entsorgter radioaktiver Abfall (RWD)
Output
  • 0.00000619
  • 8.835E-9
  • 0.00001924
  • 0.000004867
  • 0.00001301
  • 0.000006509
  • 4.034E-7
  • 0.000001457
  • 1.031E-7
  • -0.000003481
Erneuerbare Primärenergie als Energieträger (PERE)
Input
  • 0.2348
  • 0.00001684
  • 0.395
  • 0.01109
  • 0.4895
  • 0.00507
  • 0.000769
  • 0.04099
  • 0.0003071
  • -0.1383
Erneuerbare Primärenergie zur stofflichen Nutzung (PERM)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Erneuerbare Sekundärbrennstoffe (RSF)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Einsatz von Sekundärstoffen (SM)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Total nicht erneuerbare Primärenergie (PENRT)
Input
  • 22.34
  • 0.001428
  • 9.3
  • 0.7884
  • 17.82
  • 0.9955
  • 0.06522
  • 0.4308
  • 0.01845
  • -7.718
Total erneuerbare Primärenergie (PERT)
Input
  • 0.2348
  • 0.00001684
  • 0.395
  • 0.01109
  • 0.4895
  • 0.00507
  • 0.000769
  • 0.04099
  • 0.0003071
  • -0.1383

IndikatorEinheit Rohstoffbereitstellung
A1
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Herstellung
A3
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Transport
A4
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Einbau
A5
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Abbruch
C1
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Abfallbehandlung
C3
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Beseitigung
C4
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Recyclingpotential
D
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Globales Erwärmungspotenzial - total (GWP-total)
  • 0.6639
  • 0.00008928
  • 0.5949
  • 0.05026
  • 1.465
  • 0.06813
  • 0.004076
  • 0.5266
  • 0.01026
  • -0.3862
Globales Erwärmungspotenzial - biogen (GWP-biogenic)
  • 0.000734
  • 4.118E-8
  • -0.00242
  • 0.00003111
  • 0.01807
  • 0.00001894
  • 0.00000188
  • 0.00007545
  • 0.000007899
  • -0.0002448
Globales Erwärmungspotenzial - fossil (GWP-fossil)
  • 0.663
  • 0.00008921
  • 0.5972
  • 0.05021
  • 1.447
  • 0.06811
  • 0.004073
  • 0.5265
  • 0.01025
  • -0.3859
Globales Erwärmungspotenzial - luluc (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.0002006
  • 3.269E-8
  • 0.0001156
  • 0.00002079
  • 0.000245
  • 0.000005368
  • 0.000001492
  • 0.00004222
  • 3.624E-7
  • -0.00002409
  • 1.295E-8
  • 1.969E-11
  • 2.486E-8
  • 1.07E-8
  • 2.451E-8
  • 1.471E-8
  • 8.99E-10
  • 1.589E-8
  • 2.267E-10
  • -4.715E-8
  • 0.002085
  • 5.739E-7
  • 0.00119
  • 0.0004464
  • 0.002882
  • 0.0009487
  • 0.0000262
  • 0.0001923
  • 0.000009
  • -0.0004172
  • 0.002653
  • 5.174E-7
  • 0.002441
  • 0.0005896
  • 0.004887
  • 0.0007124
  • 0.00002362
  • 0.0002348
  • 0.000006394
  • -0.0003974
  • 0.005034
  • 0.00000201
  • 0.003755
  • 0.001631
  • 0.008619
  • 0.003451
  • 0.00009177
  • 0.0007159
  • 0.00002352
  • -0.001165
  • 0.00001422
  • 8.999E-10
  • 0.00001775
  • 5.922E-7
  • 0.00001364
  • 2.48E-7
  • 4.109E-8
  • 0.000001566
  • 1.315E-8
  • -9.1E-7
  • 0.0004518
  • 1.823E-7
  • 0.0003373
  • 0.0001463
  • 0.001468
  • 0.0003145
  • 0.000008324
  • 0.00006427
  • 0.000003875
  • -0.000106
Wasser-Entzugspotenzial (Benutzer) (WDP)
  • 0.2445
  • 0.000004814
  • 0.09142
  • 0.003258
  • 1.003
  • 0.001256
  • 0.0002198
  • 0.02647
  • 0.0007433
  • -0.04931
Potenzial für die Verknappung abiotischer Ressourcen – nicht fossile Ressourcen (ADPE)
  • 0.00000607
  • 2.26E-9
  • 0.000001364
  • 8.788E-7
  • 0.000002653
  • 1.045E-7
  • 1.032E-7
  • 6.667E-7
  • 7.847E-9
  • -3.585E-7
Potenzial für die Verknappung abiotischer Ressourcen – fossile Brennstoffe (ADPF)
  • 20.83
  • 0.001345
  • 8.746
  • 0.7426
  • 16.6
  • 0.9374
  • 0.06143
  • 0.4054
  • 0.01736
  • -6.992

IndikatorEinheit Rohstoffbereitstellung
A1
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Transport
A2
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Herstellung
A3
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Transport
A4
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Einbau
A5
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Abbruch
C1
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Transport
C2
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Abfallbehandlung
C3
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Beseitigung
C4
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
Recyclingpotential
D
Standard scenario (Standardszenario)
1Diese Wirkungskategorie behandelt hauptsächlich die mögliche Wirkung einer ionisierenden Strahlung geringer Dosis auf die menschliche Gesundheit im Kernbrennstoffkreislauf. Sie berücksichtigt weder Auswirkungen, die auf mögliche nukleare Unfälle und berufsbedingte Exposition zurückzuführen sind, noch auf die Entsorgung radioaktiver Abfälle in unterirdischen Anlagen. Die potenzielle vom Boden, von Radon und von einigen Baustoffen ausgehende ionisierende Strahlung wird ebenfalls nicht von diesem Indikator gemessen.
2Die Ergebnisse dieses Umweltwirkungsindikators müssen mit Bedacht angewendet werden, da die Unsicherheiten bei diesen Ergebnissen hoch sind oder da es mit dem Indikator nur begrenzte Erfahrungen gibt.
Potenzielle Toxizitätsvergleichseinheit für den Menschen - kanzerogene Wirkung (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.528E-10
  • 3.892E-14
  • 1.504E-10
  • 2.006E-11
  • 5.808E-10
  • 1.975E-11
  • 1.777E-12
  • 1.086E-10
  • 4.842E-13
  • -3.031E-11
Potenzielle Toxizitätsvergleichseinheit für den Menschen - nicht kanzerogene Wirkung (HTP-nc) 2
  • 4.809E-9
  • 1.312E-12
  • 4.302E-9
  • 6.204E-10
  • 4.991E-9
  • 4.853E-10
  • 5.992E-11
  • 2.092E-9
  • 1.201E-11
  • -5.01E-10
Potenzielles Auftreten von Krankheiten aufgrund von Feinstaubemissionen (PM) 2
  • 2.167E-8
  • 8.025E-12
  • 7.944E-9
  • 3.555E-9
  • 5.154E-8
  • 1.888E-8
  • 3.664E-10
  • 1.903E-9
  • 1.206E-10
  • -1.707E-9
Potenzielle Wirkung durch Exposition des Menschen mit U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.00668
  • 0.000005637
  • 0.02171
  • 0.003167
  • 0.0132
  • 0.004017
  • 0.0002574
  • 0.001659
  • 0.00006792
  • -0.002616
Potenzielle Toxizitätsvergleichseinheit für Ökosysteme (ETP-fw) 2
  • 7.804
  • 0.0012
  • 7.125
  • 0.6121
  • 5.668
  • 0.5651
  • 0.05478
  • 6.531
  • 0.01846
  • -0.5108
Potenzieller Bodenqualitätsindex (SQP) 2
  • 0.7475
  • 0.001167
  • 1.152
  • 0.4727
  • 1.557
  • 0.1196
  • 0.05327
  • 0.1493
  • 0.04103
  • -0.7492